"Sharing is caring" men det kostar: "RHODE ISLAND. 28-årige Joel Tenenbaum laddade ner 30 låtar och tvingas böta omkring fem miljoner kronor. Tenebaum har kämpat i tre år för att slippa betala men nu har högsta domstolen bestämt sig." läs hela När ska Mangaserier i ens dator kosta liknande summa. Barnporr är väl det allra värsta brottet vi känner till. Vad gör Alliansen?
Stöd svensk ekonomi: KÖP SVENSKA VAROR, se där en slogan från förr, som tjänade oss väl. Några förslag: 1. Skänk dina lökskal till staten. "Hundratals ton svenska lökskal, räkskal, björkbark och annat avfall skulle kunna användas för att utvinna nyttiga antioxidanter och antiinflammatoriska ämnen." Läs källan 2. Hindra privatskolor att drivas med vinst. Lyssna på MP. Kanske även Vattenfall bör hindras från att drivas med vinst? Vem blir först med detta förslag. Vad tycker MP? 3. Tjäna pengar på utländska bärplockare, betalt efter utfört arbete? Pjosk. 4. Ta bra betalt av utländska studenter vid svenska högskolor, kan ge bidrag till en ökad utbildningskvalité. 5. Bygg fler Bottniabanor, kan dra turister. Osv, Osv
Du menar Thomas Jeffersson's anförande om hur spridning av information berikar alla utan att utarma någon?
"It has been pretended by some, (and in England especially,) that inventors have a natural and exclusive right to their inventions, and not merely for their own lives, but inheritable to their heirs. But while it is a moot question whether the origin of any kind of property is derived from nature at all, it would be singular to admit a natural and even an hereditary right to inventors. It is agreed by those who have seriously considered the subject, that no individual has, of natural right, a separate property in an acre of land, for instance.
By an universal law, indeed, whatever, whether fixed or movable, belongs to all men equally and in common, is the property for the moment of him who occupies it, but when he relinquishes the occupation, the property goes with it. Stable ownership is the gift of social law, and is given late in the progress of society. It would be curious then, if an idea, the fugitive fermentation of an individual brain, could, of natural right, be claimed in exclusive and stable property.
If nature has made any one thing less susceptible than all others of exclusive property, it is the action of the thinking power called an idea, which an individual may exclusively possess as long as he keeps it to himself; but the moment it is divulged, it forces itself into the possession of every one, and the receiver cannot dispossess himself of it. Its peculiar character, too, is that no one possesses the less, because every other possesses the whole of it. He who receives an idea from me, receives instruction himself without lessening mine; as he who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me.
That ideas should freely spread from one to another over the globe, for the moral and mutual instruction of man, and improvement of his condition, seems to have been peculiarly and benevolently designed by nature, when she made them, like fire, expansible over all space, without lessening their density in any point, and like the air in which we breathe, move, and have our physical being, incapable of confinement or exclusive appropriation. Inventions then cannot, in nature, be a subject of property.
Society may give an exclusive right to the profits arising from them, as an encouragement to men to pursue ideas which may produce utility, but this may or may not be done, according to the will and convenience of the society, without claim or complaint from anybody. Accordingly, it is a fact, as far as I am informed, that England was, until we copied her, the only country on earth which ever, by a general law, gave a legal right to the exclusive use of an idea. In some other countries it is sometimes done, in a great case, and by a special and personal act, but, generally speaking, other nations have thought that these monopolies produce more embarrassment than advantage to society; and it may be observed that the nations which refuse monopolies of invention, are as fruitful as England in new and useful devices."
–Thomas Jefferson, letter to Isaac McPherson, 13 August 1813 http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/a1_8_8s12.html
"Sharing is caring" men det kostar:
SvaraRadera"RHODE ISLAND. 28-årige Joel Tenenbaum laddade ner 30 låtar och tvingas böta omkring fem miljoner kronor. Tenebaum har kämpat i tre år för att slippa betala men nu har högsta domstolen bestämt sig."
läs hela
När ska Mangaserier i ens dator kosta liknande summa. Barnporr är väl det allra värsta brottet vi känner till. Vad gör Alliansen?
Jag tror att just stearinljus är en mycket bra metafor när man måste förklara för någon datoranalfabet varför kopiering inte är stöld.
SvaraRaderaStöd svensk ekonomi:
SvaraRaderaKÖP SVENSKA VAROR, se där en slogan från förr, som tjänade oss väl.
Några förslag:
1. Skänk dina lökskal till staten.
"Hundratals ton svenska lökskal, räkskal, björkbark och annat avfall skulle kunna användas för att utvinna nyttiga antioxidanter och antiinflammatoriska ämnen."
Läs källan
2. Hindra privatskolor att drivas med vinst. Lyssna på MP.
Kanske även Vattenfall bör hindras från att drivas med vinst?
Vem blir först med detta förslag. Vad tycker MP?
3. Tjäna pengar på utländska bärplockare, betalt efter utfört arbete? Pjosk.
4. Ta bra betalt av utländska studenter vid svenska högskolor, kan ge bidrag till en ökad utbildningskvalité.
5. Bygg fler Bottniabanor, kan dra turister.
Osv, Osv
@Björn Persson
SvaraRaderaDu menar Thomas Jeffersson's anförande om hur spridning av information berikar alla utan att utarma någon?
"It has been pretended by some, (and in England especially,) that inventors have a natural and exclusive right to their inventions, and not merely for their own lives, but inheritable to their heirs. But while it is a moot question whether the origin of any kind of property is derived from nature at all, it would be singular to admit a natural and even an hereditary right to inventors. It is agreed by those who have seriously considered the subject, that no individual has, of natural right, a separate property in an acre of land, for instance.
By an universal law, indeed, whatever, whether fixed or movable, belongs to all men equally and in common, is the property for the moment of him who occupies it, but when he relinquishes the occupation, the property goes with it. Stable ownership is the gift of social law, and is given late in the progress of society. It would be curious then, if an idea, the fugitive fermentation of an individual brain, could, of natural right, be claimed in exclusive and stable property.
If nature has made any one thing less susceptible than all others of exclusive property, it is the action of the thinking power called an idea, which an individual may exclusively possess as long as he keeps it to himself; but the moment it is divulged, it forces itself into the possession of every one, and the receiver cannot dispossess himself of it. Its peculiar character, too, is that no one possesses the less, because every other possesses the whole of it. He who receives an idea from me, receives instruction himself without lessening mine; as he who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me.
That ideas should freely spread from one to another over the globe, for the moral and mutual instruction of man, and improvement of his condition, seems to have been peculiarly and benevolently designed by nature, when she made them, like fire, expansible over all space, without lessening their density in any point, and like the air in which we breathe, move, and have our physical being, incapable of confinement or exclusive appropriation. Inventions then cannot, in nature, be a subject of property.
Society may give an exclusive right to the profits arising from them, as an encouragement to men to pursue ideas which may produce utility, but this may or may not be done, according to the will and convenience of the society, without claim or complaint from anybody. Accordingly, it is a fact, as far as I am informed, that England was, until we copied her, the only country on earth which ever, by a general law, gave a legal right to the exclusive use of an idea. In some other countries it is sometimes done, in a great case, and by a special and personal act, but, generally speaking, other nations have thought that these monopolies produce more embarrassment than advantage to society; and it may be observed that the nations which refuse monopolies of invention, are as fruitful as England in new and useful devices."
–Thomas Jefferson, letter to Isaac McPherson, 13 August 1813
http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/a1_8_8s12.html
Men hur skall tändstickstillverkarna få betaaaalt?
SvaraRadera